was capable of the vague‐ness and photo‐awareness that I saw in practitioners.
Looking back, these images are meaningless to me. So I don’t have much to say
about them. The reason I include them is precisely because they are meaningless. I
am using title‐ing to show this .
Nonsense from what I got into it (“plagiarism” left, “she was a pilot’s wife” right)
This period did not last long as this is when I started reading Queneau and Wietz.
This is probably my first attempt at detornement, something that would become
much more important in my work. The development of my theory was superimposing a drunk friend on Kandinsky.
No comments:
Post a Comment